Within and around G-rich regions (Table 2). Site-directed mutagenesis of Grepeat Chebulagic acid chemical information motifs was studied to determine their roles in HAS1 splicing. Mutagenized sequences for each motif are shown in Figure 3. Splicing profiles driven by various mutagenized G345 constructs are summarized in Figure 4A. Here, we 
show that Grepeat motifs in HAS1 intron 3 play an important role in preventing exon 4 skipping. When all 28 G-repeat motifs were disrupted (G345/G1?8 m), the dominant splicing pattern (HAS1FL) was abolished, but splicing to generate HAS1Va was retained (Va..FL). Less extensive mutagenesis, affecting only G1?8 (G345/G1?8 m) completely eliminated both FL and Va expression. This 
was replaced by multiple abnormal spliced products utilizing unconventional cryptic 59 SS (Figure 4B). The complete loss of FL and Va in G345/G1?8 m could potentially be due to altered secondary structure since G345/G1?8 m (all motifs disrupted, including G1?8) still produced HAS1Va. Exon 4 skipping was most order Peptide M pronounced when only G19?8 repeats were mutagenized (G345/G19?8 m), in this case yielding only HAS1Va. More refined mutagenesis was studied to define the motifs within G19?8 that are most relevant to prevent exon 4 skipping. An elevated Va:FL ratio was observed among three constructs with mutagenized G19?4, G25?8 and G27?8. The highest Va:FL ratio was produced by G345/G25?8 m, followed by G345/G27?8 m and G345/G19?4 m and was consistent in replicate experiments (n = 5). This suggests that they all contribute to the inclusion of exon 4 but at variable degrees and are likely to work additively in this subregion. Altogether, this analysis showed that sequence modification of critical G- motifs appears to compromise the normal pattern of HAS1 expression by promoting increased exon 4 skipping.5. Mutagenesis of G-repeat Motifs in Del1 Construct Promotes HAS1Vb ExpressionDerivatives of del1 carrying mutagenized G-repeat motifs were studied in parallel to those of G345 carrying the same mutagenized motifs. Construct del1 serves as a model whereby both authentic and alternative 39SS in intron 4 are frequently used to form HAS1FL or HAS1Vd (Figure 2B). Since HAS1Vb and HAS1Vd utilize the same alternative splice site, we asked if manipulation of G-repeat motifs in del1 would affect HAS1Vb expression. Splicing analysis of del1 derivatives is shown in Figure 5. Overall, this analysis showed that G-repeat motifs are important for the selection of splicing pathway, consistent with those found in G345 derivatives with the significant 1326631 exception that 24786787 all del1 derivatives gave rise to increased HAS1Vb expression; this did not occur for the G345 derivatives (Figure 4A). In del1/G1?8 m or del1/G19?8 m, HAS1FL expression was almost eliminated and splicing to form HAS1Va and HAS1Vb became dominant. In del1/G1?8 m, multiple aberrant splicing events predominated over the frequent variants usually detected, in line with those observed in G345/G1?8 m. Splicing was least disturbed in del1/ G19?4 m. Exon 4 skipping driven by del1/G25?8 m was more pronounced than that by del1/G27?8 m, in both cases yielding increased expression of HAS1Va and HAS1Vb when compared to parental del1. Our study thus demonstrated that aberrant HAS1Vb splicing could be enhanced by combining genetic manipulation events that lead to increased exon 4 skipping with genetic manipulations that enable increased usage of alternative 39SS (259).Intronic Changes Alter HAS1 SplicingFigure 3. Site-directed mutagenesis of HAS1.Within and around G-rich regions (Table 2). Site-directed mutagenesis of Grepeat motifs was studied to determine their roles in HAS1 splicing. Mutagenized sequences for each motif are shown in Figure 3. Splicing profiles driven by various mutagenized G345 constructs are summarized in Figure 4A. Here, we show that Grepeat motifs in HAS1 intron 3 play an important role in preventing exon 4 skipping. When all 28 G-repeat motifs were disrupted (G345/G1?8 m), the dominant splicing pattern (HAS1FL) was abolished, but splicing to generate HAS1Va was retained (Va..FL). Less extensive mutagenesis, affecting only G1?8 (G345/G1?8 m) completely eliminated both FL and Va expression. This was replaced by multiple abnormal spliced products utilizing unconventional cryptic 59 SS (Figure 4B). The complete loss of FL and Va in G345/G1?8 m could potentially be due to altered secondary structure since G345/G1?8 m (all motifs disrupted, including G1?8) still produced HAS1Va. Exon 4 skipping was most pronounced when only G19?8 repeats were mutagenized (G345/G19?8 m), in this case yielding only HAS1Va. More refined mutagenesis was studied to define the motifs within G19?8 that are most relevant to prevent exon 4 skipping. An elevated Va:FL ratio was observed among three constructs with mutagenized G19?4, G25?8 and G27?8. The highest Va:FL ratio was produced by G345/G25?8 m, followed by G345/G27?8 m and G345/G19?4 m and was consistent in replicate experiments (n = 5). This suggests that they all contribute to the inclusion of exon 4 but at variable degrees and are likely to work additively in this subregion. Altogether, this analysis showed that sequence modification of critical G- motifs appears to compromise the normal pattern of HAS1 expression by promoting increased exon 4 skipping.5. Mutagenesis of G-repeat Motifs in Del1 Construct Promotes HAS1Vb ExpressionDerivatives of del1 carrying mutagenized G-repeat motifs were studied in parallel to those of G345 carrying the same mutagenized motifs. Construct del1 serves as a model whereby both authentic and alternative 39SS in intron 4 are frequently used to form HAS1FL or HAS1Vd (Figure 2B). Since HAS1Vb and HAS1Vd utilize the same alternative splice site, we asked if manipulation of G-repeat motifs in del1 would affect HAS1Vb expression. Splicing analysis of del1 derivatives is shown in Figure 5. Overall, this analysis showed that G-repeat motifs are important for the selection of splicing pathway, consistent with those found in G345 derivatives with the significant 1326631 exception that 24786787 all del1 derivatives gave rise to increased HAS1Vb expression; this did not occur for the G345 derivatives (Figure 4A). In del1/G1?8 m or del1/G19?8 m, HAS1FL expression was almost eliminated and splicing to form HAS1Va and HAS1Vb became dominant. In del1/G1?8 m, multiple aberrant splicing events predominated over the frequent variants usually detected, in line with those observed in G345/G1?8 m. Splicing was least disturbed in del1/ G19?4 m. Exon 4 skipping driven by del1/G25?8 m was more pronounced than that by del1/G27?8 m, in both cases yielding increased expression of HAS1Va and HAS1Vb when compared to parental del1. Our study thus demonstrated that aberrant HAS1Vb splicing could be enhanced by combining genetic manipulation events that lead to increased exon 4 skipping with genetic manipulations that enable increased usage of alternative 39SS (259).Intronic Changes Alter HAS1 SplicingFigure 3. Site-directed mutagenesis of HAS1.
