T increases the production of this non-functional hTERT, suggesting a strategy for cancer therapeutics by manipulating hTERT alternative splicing118. Inducing MedChemExpress Sodium laureth sulfate angiogenesis Angiogenesis is the physiological process involving the growth of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones. The tumor-associated neovasculature, generated by the process of angiogenesis, gives tumors the access to blood circulation and facilitates PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19851335 tumors to grow beyond just a few millimeters in size119. In contrast to physiological processes, such as wound healing and female reproductive cycling, in which angiogenesis is only turned on transiently, tumors remain activated angiogenesis, enabling sustained growth of new vessels and neoplastic tissues. The best studied and probably most important growth factor that promotes angiogenesis is the vascular endothelial growth factor-A. Accumulating evidence has shown that VEGF is regulated by alternative splicing120, 121. The VEGF gene is comprised of eight exons. Exon 8 contains a proximal 3′ splice site and a distal 3′ splice site122. When the proximal splice site is used, cells generate VEGF mRNAs that encode pro-angiogenesis VEGF proteins. By contrast, the usage of the distal 3′ splice site of exon 8 results in the production of the VEGFb isoforms that exhibit antiangiogenic activities123. For example, VEGF165 and VEGF165b are two isoforms that differ in the C-terminal region as a result of exon 8 alternative splicing. Although both isoforms bind to VEGFR, binding of VEGF165b to VEGFR induces differential phosphorylation and intracellular trafficking as compared to VEGF165, resulting in angiogenesis blockage123125. Additionally, exons 6 and 7 can be alternatively spliced, increasing the numbers of VEGF isoforms, and thus, the functional diversity of VEGF120. Mechanistic studies on the alternative splicing of VEGF demonstrated that splicing regulators SRSF1 and SRSF5 promote the usage of VEGF exon 8 proximal 3′ splice site, thus favoring the production of VEGF126. Insulin-like growth factor promotes the activity of SRSF1 by activating PKC signaling, which stimulates SRPK1, SR 127 Protein-Specific Kinase 1, that phosphorylates SRSF1. By contrast, SRSF6 and SRSF2 facilitate the selection of the distal 3′ splice site, resulting in VEGFb production126. These results suggest that signaling-mediated VEGF alternative splicing controls the balance of pro-angiogenic VEGF and anti-angiogenic VEGFb. This view was further supported by a recent finding showing that mutations in WT1, the Wilm’s tumor suppressor gene, suppress the production of VEGF165b, causing abnormal activity of angiogenesis and Wilms’ tumors128. WT1 represses the transcription of SRPK1 by 
directly binding to its promoter. SRPK1 phosphorylates SRSF1 that enhances the ability of SRSF1 to promote the production of VEGF. Thus, in WT1 mutant cells SRPK1 is highly expressed, resulting in TAK 438 free base manufacturer hyperphosphorylation of SRSF1, which in turn favors the production of VEGF and renders the WT1 mutant cells proangiogenic128. Currently, the available anti-VEGF cancer therapeutics, such as the anti-VEGF antibody Bevacizumab, does not distinguish between different spliced isoforms of VEGF129. This poses a dilemma in clinics as VEGF165b competes with VEGF165 for binding to Bevacizumab, resulting in drug resistance and side effects129.Regulation of alternative splicing through mutations in cis-elements Mutations in cis-acting splicing elements can disrupt or create splicing regulatory eleme.T increases the production of this non-functional hTERT, suggesting a strategy for cancer therapeutics by manipulating hTERT alternative splicing118. Inducing angiogenesis Angiogenesis is the physiological process involving the growth of new blood vessels from pre-existing ones. The tumor-associated neovasculature, generated by the process of angiogenesis, gives tumors the access to blood circulation and facilitates PubMed ID:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19851335 tumors to grow beyond just a few millimeters in size119. In contrast to physiological processes, such as wound healing and female reproductive cycling, in which angiogenesis is only turned on transiently, tumors remain activated angiogenesis, enabling sustained growth of new vessels and neoplastic tissues. The best studied and probably most important 
growth factor that promotes angiogenesis is the vascular endothelial growth factor-A. Accumulating evidence has shown that VEGF is regulated by alternative splicing120, 121. The VEGF gene is comprised of eight exons. Exon 8 contains a proximal 3′ splice site and a distal 3′ splice site122. When the proximal splice site is used, cells generate VEGF mRNAs that encode pro-angiogenesis VEGF proteins. By contrast, the usage of the distal 3′ splice site of exon 8 results in the production of the VEGFb isoforms that exhibit antiangiogenic activities123. For example, VEGF165 and VEGF165b are two isoforms that differ in the C-terminal region as a result of exon 8 alternative splicing. Although both isoforms bind to VEGFR, binding of VEGF165b to VEGFR induces differential phosphorylation and intracellular trafficking as compared to VEGF165, resulting in angiogenesis blockage123125. Additionally, exons 6 and 7 can be alternatively spliced, increasing the numbers of VEGF isoforms, and thus, the functional diversity of VEGF120. Mechanistic studies on the alternative splicing of VEGF demonstrated that splicing regulators SRSF1 and SRSF5 promote the usage of VEGF exon 8 proximal 3′ splice site, thus favoring the production of VEGF126. Insulin-like growth factor promotes the activity of SRSF1 by activating PKC signaling, which stimulates SRPK1, SR 127 Protein-Specific Kinase 1, that phosphorylates SRSF1. By contrast, SRSF6 and SRSF2 facilitate the selection of the distal 3′ splice site, resulting in VEGFb production126. These results suggest that signaling-mediated VEGF alternative splicing controls the balance of pro-angiogenic VEGF and anti-angiogenic VEGFb. This view was further supported by a recent finding showing that mutations in WT1, the Wilm’s tumor suppressor gene, suppress the production of VEGF165b, causing abnormal activity of angiogenesis and Wilms’ tumors128. WT1 represses the transcription of SRPK1 by directly binding to its promoter. SRPK1 phosphorylates SRSF1 that enhances the ability of SRSF1 to promote the production of VEGF. Thus, in WT1 mutant cells SRPK1 is highly expressed, resulting in hyperphosphorylation of SRSF1, which in turn favors the production of VEGF and renders the WT1 mutant cells proangiogenic128. Currently, the available anti-VEGF cancer therapeutics, such as the anti-VEGF antibody Bevacizumab, does not distinguish between different spliced isoforms of VEGF129. This poses a dilemma in clinics as VEGF165b competes with VEGF165 for binding to Bevacizumab, resulting in drug resistance and side effects129.Regulation of alternative splicing through mutations in cis-elements Mutations in cis-acting splicing elements can disrupt or create splicing regulatory eleme.
