Engths that are both methodological and conceptual in nature. First, the longitudinal, multi-method design allowed us to examine relative change in couples’ behaviors over time. Second, we extracted each of our measures from different sources (self-report, other-report, observer report) across a considerable amount of time, which minimized the potential for shared-method variance problems. Third, because we drew participants from a fairly large, long-term study of families, we were able to examine two generations of romantic couples assessed over a decade apart and replicate support for our hypotheses within the same study. This point is especially compelling given the importance of empirical replication in all disciplines of science (e.g., Schmidt, 2009). Fourth, work on resilience has primarily focused on individual characteristics (e.g., cognitive skill) as possible sources of resilience to adversity. The present study, however, provides empirical evidence for the importance of positive couple-based skills that appear independent of individual differences in conscientiousness as an additional element of resilience to stress. We anticipate future work of this kind will shed more light on effective problem solving as a resource for couples and hope that other couple-based resources that promote resilience and adaptation to stress over time will be incorporated into our current understanding of what makes couples and families thrive. We may never be able to completely control our economic situations, but making small, positive changes in our dayto-day interactions with our partners–changes that family practitioners and educators devote their efforts to encourage–might make all the difference in promoting healthy and happy romantic relationships, even amidst economic pressures.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptSupplementary MaterialRefer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.J Marriage Fam. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Masarik et al.PageAcknowledgmentsSupport for this work was provided by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the National Institute of Mental Health (DAO17902, HD047573, HD051746, HD064687, and MH051361).Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Ana Paula de O. Menezes1, Jailton Azevedo1, Mariela C. Leite2, Leila C. Campos1, Marcelo Cunha3, Maria da Gloria S. Carvalho4, Mitermayer G. Reis1, Albert I. Ko1,5, Daniel M. GSK-AHABMedChemExpress GSK-AHAB Weinberger5, Guilherme Ribeiro1,6, and Joice N. Reis1,2,?1Centrode Pesquisas Gon lo Moniz, Funda o Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil de Farm ia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil2Faculdade 3EscolaNacional de Sa e P lica, Funda o Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven,4Respiratory 5DepartmentUSA6Institutode Sa e Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BrazilAbstractInformation on pneumococcal carriage in the pre-vaccine PF-04418948 dose period is essential to predict and assess the impact of PCV in settings where disease surveillance is particularly difficult. Therefore, we present data on pneumococcal carriage before the introduction of the 10-valent-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) in Brazil. We conducted a prospective study on a cohort of 203 children aged < 5 years.Engths that are both methodological and conceptual in nature. First, the longitudinal, multi-method design allowed us to examine relative change in couples' behaviors over time. Second, we extracted each of our measures from different sources (self-report, other-report, observer report) across a considerable amount of time, which minimized the potential for shared-method variance problems. Third, because we drew participants from a fairly large, long-term study of families, we were able to examine two generations of romantic couples assessed over a decade apart and replicate support for our hypotheses within the same study. This point is especially compelling given the importance of empirical replication in all disciplines of science (e.g., Schmidt, 2009). Fourth, work on resilience has primarily focused on individual characteristics (e.g., cognitive skill) as possible sources of resilience to adversity. The present study, however, provides empirical evidence for the importance of positive couple-based skills that appear independent of individual differences in conscientiousness as an additional element of resilience to stress. We anticipate future work of this kind will shed more light on effective problem solving as a resource for couples and hope that other couple-based resources that promote resilience and adaptation to stress over time will be incorporated into our current understanding of what makes couples and families thrive. We may never be able to completely control our economic situations, but making small, positive changes in our dayto-day interactions with our partners--changes that family practitioners and educators devote their efforts to encourage--might make all the difference in promoting healthy and happy romantic relationships, even amidst economic pressures.Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author ManuscriptSupplementary MaterialRefer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.J Marriage Fam. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 April 01.Masarik et al.PageAcknowledgmentsSupport for this work was provided by grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institute on Drug Abuse, and the National Institute of Mental Health (DAO17902, HD047573, HD051746, HD064687, and MH051361).Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
Ana Paula de O. Menezes1, Jailton Azevedo1, Mariela C. Leite2, Leila C. Campos1, Marcelo Cunha3, Maria da Gloria S. Carvalho4, Mitermayer G. Reis1, Albert I. Ko1,5, Daniel M. Weinberger5, Guilherme Ribeiro1,6, and Joice N. Reis1,2,?1Centrode Pesquisas Gon lo Moniz, Funda o Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil de Farm ia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, Brazil2Faculdade 3EscolaNacional de Sa e P lica, Funda o Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven,4Respiratory 5DepartmentUSA6Institutode Sa e Coletiva, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BrazilAbstractInformation on pneumococcal carriage in the pre-vaccine period is essential to predict and assess the impact of PCV in settings where disease surveillance is particularly difficult. Therefore, we present data on pneumococcal carriage before the introduction of the 10-valent-pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV10) in Brazil. We conducted a prospective study on a cohort of 203 children aged < 5 years.
