) None Hormone replacement therapy ) Full testosterone replacement two) No or low HRT
) None Hormone replacement therapy ) Complete testosterone replacement two) No or low HRT 3) Transitional (higher) estrogen Buddy or lover performed their castration Underground cutter performed their castration Selfcastrated Personal castration performed by an MD 45.six 38.two 72 (3) 27 (2) 2 (9) 25 25 29 (three) 4 (three) 24 (0) 9 (8) 43 (8) 4 (6) 23 (0) 8 (8) four (6) (5) (5) 9 (four) 40 (7) six (7) 6 (7) 2 9 (four) 6 (7) 40 (7) two (9) 0 (0) 33 (4) 67 (24) 34 (5) 27 (two) six (7) 26 0 (four) 2 (9) 2 (5) four (6) 27 (2) six (26) 50 (22) 64 (28) 4 (6) 7 (three) 23 (0) 7 (three) four (six) 43 (9) eight (eight) 4 (7) 45 (9) 4 (6) 30 (3) 25 9 (4) (5) Noncutters 46.9 39.three 63 (23) 20 (39) 9 (six) 39 (73) two (23) 40 (76) 0.03 two (22) 30 (55) 36 (66) 23 (42) 0.0 7 (3) 2 (23) 28 (55) 33 (64) 4 (eight) three (26) four (7) 0.0 7 (33) 4 (27) 26 (50) three (25) four (27) 7 (34) 23 (four) 5 (29) four (five) eight (35) 66 (7) 23 (45) 2 (40) three (25) 6 (3) two (2) five (28) 4 (eight) 3 (six) 34 (66) 23 (45) 30 (58) 40 (78) six (30) 75 (45) five (28) 0 (20) three (25) 48 (94) 7 (34) 0.five 29 (55) 62 (7) 0 (8) six 6 9 (38) 48 (94) P value 0.4 0.68 0.30 0.73 0.0.02 0.36 0.82 0.89 0.77 0.22 0.46 0.29 0.4 0.93 0.65 0.063 0.005 0.70 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.89 0.0.96 0.0.00 0.00 0.0 0.The amount of responses is provided in parentheses following the percentages. Bold text indicates significant comparisons.Sex Med 204;2:2204 The Authors. Sexual Medicine published by Wiley PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25620969 Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Sexual Medicine.Nonmedical Castrations: Characterizing Cutters A notable percentage of each the cutters as well as the physically castrated participants reported having been Cecropin B biological activity raised in “very devout” households that possibly condemned certain sexual activities and behaviors (see [4]). Young children raised in devoutly religious homes are frequently taught that sexual activities for pleasure, including masturbation, or certain sexual orientations and partnerships, which include homosexuality, are sinful. Among our respondents, 34 of cutters and 23 of noncutters reported their longest sexual relationship was using a male. As children threatened with genital mutilation, they might have come to think that castration is often a approach to manage undesirable sexual thoughts and activities. Certainly an association involving devout religiosity, being threatened with genital mutilation, and being physically castrated is evidenced in our information and discussed in Vale et al. [4]. These danger components may possibly synergistically lead to a need for castration. Having said that, it’s significantly less clear how they contribute to a desire to castrate others, as important differences in these variables weren’t noticed between the cutters and also the physically castrated subgroup. Possibly contradictory to this is the locating that 67 of physically castrated cutters and 66 of physically castrated noncutters reported that thinking about sex in no way tends to make them feel guilty. Also, four of all cutters report identifying as “eunuch,” “third gender,” or “other,” while in spite of this, 37 of all cutters report presenting as “very masculine.” Regrettably we did not ask explicitly in regards to the motivation for castrating other 
people. Nor did we ask about the number of castrations the cutter had participated in. Without having such extra information, it is actually impossible to tell if these are contradictory danger things (i.e selfidentifying as getting “very masculine,” however determine as outside the gender binary), or hints of subgroups within the bigger cutter population. Our comparison.
