L. The main analyses consisted of two parts: examining the level
L. The principal analyses consisted of two components: examining the amount of perceived stereotype threat and evaluating a priori predictors of stereotype threat. For hypothesis a single that participants would perceive higher levels of selfown stereotype threat compared to group stereotype threat, a paired samples ttest was performed. For hypothesis two, the association between stereotype threat and hypothesized predictors were examined employing bivariate correlations. For hypothesis 3 that the predictor variables would be a lot more strongly related to selfown stereotype threat when compared with group stereotype threat, dependent r comparisons had been carried out [20]. Ultimately, two extra posthoc exploratory hierarchical linear regressions have been conducted with selfown stereotype threat and group stereotype threat as the dependent variables. For both regressions, gender was entered into step along with the following variables were entered into step 2: BMI, group identity, stereotype endorsement, stigma consciousness, fear of fat, and selfesteem.ResultsPreliminary Analyses For demographic variables, MANOVA indicated a considerable impact for gender only (F (two, 95) 8.32, p 0.0). As hypothesized, females endorsed drastically larger levels of perceived selfown stereotype threat (five.80 three.93) compared to males (3.28 three.two). Similarly, females endorsed drastically higher levels of perceived group stereotype threat (4.50 three.60) when compared with males (2.52 two.7). Neither education level nor revenue was significantly linked with perceived stereotype threat. Age was not considerably correlated with either selfown or group stereotype threat. For that reason, gender was entered as a covariate into subsequent analyses. Participants had been asked to decide on a single damaging stereotype about people with obesity upon which they would base an imagined threatening scenario. They chose unattractiveness (44 ), PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19578846 laziness (23 ), lack of willpower (6 ), normally binge eats (4 ), unintelligence , poor hygiene , or did not respond . ANOVA indicated that there was a signifObes Details 203;six:25868 DOI: 0.59000352029 203 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg kargerofaCarels et al.: Examining Perceived Stereotype Threat amongst OverweightObese Adults Employing a MultiThreat FrameworkTable . Drastically various correlations among threat targets and connected variablesTarget of threat Self Group DifferenceGroup identity 0.40 0.29 0.0Stereotype endorsement 0.27 0.22 0.Stigma consciousness 0.50 0.36 0.4AFA willpower 0.07 0.08 0.AFA dislike 0.03 0.05 0.AFA fear of fat 0.40 0.25 0.5BMI 0.six 0.five 0.OICR-9429 manufacturer Selfesteem .45 .3 0.4Significant correlation among threat form rating and psychosocial variable, p 0.05. Important difference amongst correlations in column, p 0.05. Differences between correlations have been measured for significance applying dependent Rs comparison.icant difference in selfown threat scores amongst participants who chose different stereotypes, F (five,209) 4.77, p 0.00. Making use of a Bonferroni posthoc test, participants who chose the unattractiveness stereotype had larger selfown threat scores (5.9) in comparison with people who chose the normally binge eats stereotype (three.8) or the laziness stereotype (three.7).Most important Analyses Hypothesis : As expected, typical selfown perceived stereotype threat (5.2 three.9) was larger than group stereotype threat (four.0 3.five; t (209) .08, p 0.00). These outcomes support the hypothesis that overweight and obese individuals would perceive stereotype threat as an attack against their very own reputation or selfconcept additional so.
