Entrations had been not statistically significant (Table one). The typical Mg concentration ranged from 136 mg kg-1 (FYM) to 164 mg kg-1 (FYM NPK2). Mean Ca concentrations ranged from 2802 mg kg-1 (FYM NPK2) to 3777 mg kg-1 (FYM). Mean soil pH was not substantially various between fertilizer remedies and ranged from six.51 (FYM N2) to 6.85 (FYM). Similarly, the concentrations of Cox and Ntot were not appreciably distinctive among fertilization YTX-465 Epigenetics therapies and ranged from one.17 (Manage) to one.29 (FYM NPK2) for Cox and from 0.15 (Manage) to 0.17 (FYM NPK2) for Ntot (Table three). 2.3.2. Ivanovice The P concentration in Ivanovice was significantly dependent on the fertilization therapy, with statistically various values in every single fertilization therapy (Table two). The lowest values have been recorded from the unfertilized Management (66 mg kg-1 , suitable), followed by FYM N2 (117 mg kg-1 , higher), FYM (169 mg kg-1 , large) plus the highest concentration was during the FYM NPK2 therapy (226 mg kg-1 , pretty large). The exact same circumstance occurred while in the situation of K. The lowest concentration was measured in Control (181 mg kg-1 ), followed by FYM N2 (288 mg kg-1 ), FYM (370 mg kg-1 ) and FYM NPK2 (447 mg kg-1 ). Statistically sizeable variations had been recorded among the Manage (A), FYM N2 (B) and FYM (C) treatment options together with FYM NPK2 (C) (Table 2, fertilizer remedies followed through the exact same letter are statistically insignificant). As in the earlier case, fertilizer application had no considerable effect on Mg and Ca concentrations, the distinctions had been not statistically sizeable. The outcomes of soil analyses for these two factors are shown in Table two.Plants 2021, ten,7 ofTable three. The prolonged erm impact of fertilization about the value of soil pH, Cox and Ntot written content. pH (KCl) Caslav Handle FYM FYM N2 FYM NPK2 Ivanovice Management FYM FYM N2 FYM NPK2 Lukavec Control FYM FYM N2 FYM NPK2 6.57 0.03 A 6.85 0.14 A 6.51 0.07 A 6.53 0.17 A 6.58 0.14 A six.69 0.08 A six.62 0.14 A 6.63 0.11 A five.84 0.06 A five.88 0.12 A five.74 0.08 A five.83 0.05 A Cox 1.17 0.06 A 1.20 0.05 A 1.twenty 0.05 A one.29 0.09 A 1.67 0.03 A 1.92 0.06 B 1.95 0.03 B 2.07 0.05 B one.41 0.05 A 1.72 0.06 AB one.72 0.03 AB one.82 0.13 B Ntot 0.15 0.01 A 0.15 0.01 A 0.16 0.01 A 0.17 0.01 A 0.20 0.01 A 0.23 0.01 A 0.23 0.01 A 0.24 0.01 A 0.19 0.01 A 0.23 0.01 B 0.23 0.01 B 0.23 0.01 BThe indicate values ( tandard error) followed from the very same letter (A –vertically–comparing the fertilizer therapies) are certainly not statistically unique (p 0.05).Soil pH was not BMS-8 Protocol impacted by fertilization and ranged from 6.58 (Handle) to 6.69 (FYM), Table 3. The Cox material was drastically impacted by fertilization. The lowest concentration was measured in Management (one.67 ), which was statistically significantly reduce than within the other solutions, which had been not drastically different from every single other. Cox concentrations in these therapies ranged from one.92 (FYM) to 2.07 (FYM NPK2). While in the situation of Ntot, we didn’t record statistically substantial distinctions in between the remedies and ranged from 0.twenty (Manage) to 0.24 (FYM NPK2), Table three. 2.three.3. Lukavec In Lukavac, the lowest P concentration was recorded while in the Management (44 mg kg-1 ), which was statistically comparable on the value of 46 mg kg-1 (FYM N2). A increased P concentration was measured inside the FYM treatment method (90 mg kg-1 ), which supplied a statistically significantly lower yield than FYM N2 (Table 2), and as a result we presume that P originating from FYM was not totally utilized.
