Udy might achieve the detection requirement for detecting the selected pesticides in real food samples. Compared with other methods (Table 2), the LODs obtained for the selected pesticides using the suspension array were lower than those reported determination methods in the literatures [23,49?56]. This indicated that the proposed method held promising applications in environmental and food monitoring.“?’Refers to the undetectable concentrations or no results. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066703.tantibody. Table S1 (Supporting information) shows the crossreaction rates of the 10457188 chemicals with the two antibodies, showing that the cross-reactivity values of the various potential crossreactants were very small and fell below 5 . Thus, it could be considered that the suspension array is very specific.Reproducibility 16574785 and Stability of the Immunoassay Based on SCCBsTo investigate the reproducibility of the photonic suspension array, we repeatedly assayed ten times at two different concentrations of the selected pesticides. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 9.12 and 6.50 for 100 and 400 ng/mL CLT, 7.83 and 5.16 for 50 and 200 ng/mL FNT, showing acceptable reproducibility. When the photonic suspension array was not in use, SCCBs were stored in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4uC. No obvious change was observed after storage for at least one year for SCCBs without probe immobilization and for at least one week for SCCBs with immobilized probe. Hence, combined with its multiplex analysis capability, the photonic suspension array here presented is a very promising analytical assay for several fields of application.Evaluation of Cross ReactivityConsidering specificity and reliability of the immunoassay, cross-reaction is a critical analytical parameter. The chemicals chosen to estimate the specificity of the suspension array were chloryrifos, bromophos, 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol, triazophos, purchase P7C3 methidathion, fenthion, paraoxon, chlorthion, parathion and parathion-methyl. To examine the cross-reactivity between the two antibodies and their Anlotinib web non-related analytes, solutions of these other chemicals with concentrations of 1024 ng/mL were analyzed by the suspension array. For anti-CLT antibody, CLT was considered as the specific analyte whilst the other reagents were classified as cross-reactants, and similarly for the anti-FNTAccuracy (Analysis of Spiked Samples)Spiked samples were used to measure the accuracy of the assay. The total number of samples assayed was sixteen (n = 3). Samples were extracted with methanol, followed by evaporation of the solvent and then dissolution of the residue in 10 mL of 10 methanol-PBS. As shown in Table 3, recoveries of 82.35 to 109.90 for CLT and 81.64 to 108.10 for FNT were obtained at all levels with RSDs of 3.22 to 9.93 and 2.93 to 8.82 , respectively. In the pesticide analysis field, recovery rates in the range of 70,120 are considered to be acceptable and can be extended to routine analysis, as recommended by the EUDetection of Pesticides with a Suspension ArrayCommission guideline about determination of pesticide residues in food [57]. Therefore, our suspension array was sufficiently accurate and could be suitable for the quantification of the selected pesticides in fruits, vegetables and water.Supporting InformationFigure S1 Photographs of two kinds of SCCBs and their reflection spectra with reflection peaks at 505 and 575 nm, respectively. (TIF) Figure S2 Scheme for immobilization of antibodies onConclusionsW.Udy might achieve the detection requirement for detecting the selected pesticides in real food samples. Compared with other methods (Table 2), the LODs obtained for the selected pesticides using the suspension array were lower than those reported determination methods in the literatures [23,49?56]. This indicated that the proposed method held promising applications in environmental and food monitoring.“?’Refers to the undetectable concentrations or no results. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066703.tantibody. Table S1 (Supporting information) shows the crossreaction rates of the 10457188 chemicals with the two antibodies, showing that the cross-reactivity values of the various potential crossreactants were very small and fell below 5 . Thus, it could be considered that the suspension array is very specific.Reproducibility 16574785 and Stability of the Immunoassay Based on SCCBsTo investigate the reproducibility of the photonic suspension array, we repeatedly assayed ten times at two different concentrations of the selected pesticides. The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 9.12 and 6.50 for 100 and 400 ng/mL CLT, 7.83 and 5.16 for 50 and 200 ng/mL FNT, showing acceptable reproducibility. When the photonic suspension array was not in use, SCCBs were stored in PBS (pH 7.4) at 4uC. No obvious change was observed after storage for at least one year for SCCBs without probe immobilization and for at least one week for SCCBs with immobilized probe. Hence, combined with its multiplex analysis capability, the photonic suspension array here presented is a very promising analytical assay for several fields of application.Evaluation of Cross ReactivityConsidering specificity and reliability of the immunoassay, cross-reaction is a critical analytical parameter. The chemicals chosen to estimate the specificity of the suspension array were chloryrifos, bromophos, 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol, triazophos, methidathion, fenthion, paraoxon, chlorthion, parathion and parathion-methyl. To examine the cross-reactivity between the two antibodies and their non-related analytes, solutions of these other chemicals with concentrations of 1024 ng/mL were analyzed by the suspension array. For anti-CLT antibody, CLT was considered as the specific analyte whilst the other reagents were classified as cross-reactants, and similarly for the anti-FNTAccuracy (Analysis of Spiked Samples)Spiked samples were used to measure the accuracy of the assay. The total number of samples assayed was sixteen (n = 3). Samples were extracted with methanol, followed by evaporation of the solvent and then dissolution of the residue in 10 mL of 10 methanol-PBS. As shown in Table 3, recoveries of 82.35 to 109.90 for CLT and 81.64 to 108.10 for FNT were obtained at all levels with RSDs of 3.22 to 9.93 and 2.93 to 8.82 , respectively. In the pesticide analysis field, recovery rates in the range of 70,120 are considered to be acceptable and can be extended to routine analysis, as recommended by the EUDetection of Pesticides with a Suspension ArrayCommission guideline about determination of pesticide residues in food [57]. Therefore, our suspension array was sufficiently accurate and could be suitable for the quantification of the selected pesticides in fruits, vegetables and water.Supporting InformationFigure S1 Photographs of two kinds of SCCBs and their reflection spectra with reflection peaks at 505 and 575 nm, respectively. (TIF) Figure S2 Scheme for immobilization of antibodies onConclusionsW.
