Expressions were different among the 3PO histological types, and were significantly higher in the well differentiated types than in the poorly differentiated type. MUC1/DF3 expression was also significantly higher in the well differentiated types than in the poorly differentiated type. We reported that MUC1 expression was high in the well differentiated adenocarcinoma in gastric MedChemExpress 58-49-1 cancers including advanced cancers, and the high MUC1 expression may affect the survival of patients with well differentiated adenocarcinoma of stomach [6]. The high expression of MUC4 in the well differentiated adenocarcinoma also may affect the survival of patients with gastric cancer. In our previous study [6], the rate of high expression of MUC1/DF3 was significantly higher in the advanced gastric cancers than that in the early gastric cancers. The relationship of MUC4 expression with the invasion of gastric cancers would be an interesting area 1326631 of study. There is controversy regarding the 
prognostic significance of MUC4/8G7 and MUC4/1G8 expression. Thus, we have reviewed 19 articles of MUC4 IHC study applied for various human cancer tissues (Table 3). The significance of MUC4/8G7 and MUC4/1G8 could not be evaluated in 8 of the 19 studies. One study using polyclonal anti-MIUC4 antibody reported that MUC4 expression is related to a fovorabel outcome [19], three studies show no correlation between MUC4 expression and prognosis [20,21,22], the other three studies did not have any comments on the correlation between MUC4 expression and prognosis [18,23,24], and the remaining one study of thyroid cancer reported no MUC4 expression in the cancer [25]. On the other hand, in the other 11 articles, there was an apparent difference of the prognostic significance between MUC4/8G7 expression and MUC4/1G8 expression. Most studies using 8G7, which was generated against human MUC4, MUC4/8G7 expression is related to aggressive tumor behavior or a poor outcome in human carcinomas [9,10,11,12,13,26]. In contrast, most studies using 1G8, which was raised against rat ASGP-2, described that MUC4/1G8 expression is related to a favorable outcome [27,28,29,30], although one study of pancreatic adenocarcinoma described that MUC4/1G8 expression is related to poor survival [31]. This clear difference raises the question of whether 8G7 and 1G8 have essentially different characters. The MAb 1G8 was raised using rat Muc4 epitope [15]. Human MUC4 and rat Muc4 shows more than 60 peptide sequence similarity [32], but they are not identical. It is noteworthy that IHC using MAb 1G8 always shows positive staining in the vascular endothelium, which is somewhat unusual as the expression of MUC4 which is one of the members of mucins. Thus, we evaluated the specificity of the MAb 8G7 and MAb 1G8 by Western blotting and IHC of two gastric cancer cell lines. Our Western blotting analysis showed that MAb 
8G7 recognized a very high molecular weight protein (over 500 kD, which was the expected size for native MUC4), whereas MAb 1G8 does not show any immunoreactive bands. The IHC analysis also showed MAb 8G7 positive staining but MAb 1G8 negative staining in the twoMUC4 and MUC1 Expression in Early Gastric Cancersgastric cancer cell lines. MUC4 mRNA was also expressed in the two gastric cancer cell lines in the present study, as shown in the previous study analyzing the pancreatic cancer cell lines by RTPCR and northen blot analyses [33,34]. Both MAb 8G7 and MAb 1G8 react with human gastric cancer tissues,.Expressions were different among the histological types, and were significantly higher in the well differentiated types than in the poorly differentiated type. MUC1/DF3 expression was also significantly higher in the well differentiated types than in the poorly differentiated type. We reported that MUC1 expression was high in the well differentiated adenocarcinoma in gastric cancers including advanced cancers, and the high MUC1 expression may affect the survival of patients with well differentiated adenocarcinoma of stomach [6]. The high expression of MUC4 in the well differentiated adenocarcinoma also may affect the survival of patients with gastric cancer. In our previous study [6], the rate of high expression of MUC1/DF3 was significantly higher in the advanced gastric cancers than that in the early gastric cancers. The relationship of MUC4 expression with the invasion of gastric cancers would be an interesting area 1326631 of study. There is controversy regarding the prognostic significance of MUC4/8G7 and MUC4/1G8 expression. Thus, we have reviewed 19 articles of MUC4 IHC study applied for various human cancer tissues (Table 3). The significance of MUC4/8G7 and MUC4/1G8 could not be evaluated in 8 of the 19 studies. One study using polyclonal anti-MIUC4 antibody reported that MUC4 expression is related to a fovorabel outcome [19], three studies show no correlation between MUC4 expression and prognosis [20,21,22], the other three studies did not have any comments on the correlation between MUC4 expression and prognosis [18,23,24], and the remaining one study of thyroid cancer reported no MUC4 expression in the cancer [25]. On the other hand, in the other 11 articles, there was an apparent difference of the prognostic significance between MUC4/8G7 expression and MUC4/1G8 expression. Most studies using 8G7, which was generated against human MUC4, MUC4/8G7 expression is related to aggressive tumor behavior or a poor outcome in human carcinomas [9,10,11,12,13,26]. In contrast, most studies using 1G8, which was raised against rat ASGP-2, described that MUC4/1G8 expression is related to a favorable outcome [27,28,29,30], although one study of pancreatic adenocarcinoma described that MUC4/1G8 expression is related to poor survival [31]. This clear difference raises the question of whether 8G7 and 1G8 have essentially different characters. The MAb 1G8 was raised using rat Muc4 epitope [15]. Human MUC4 and rat Muc4 shows more than 60 peptide sequence similarity [32], but they are not identical. It is noteworthy that IHC using MAb 1G8 always shows positive staining in the vascular endothelium, which is somewhat unusual as the expression of MUC4 which is one of the members of mucins. Thus, we evaluated the specificity of the MAb 8G7 and MAb 1G8 by Western blotting and IHC of two gastric cancer cell lines. Our Western blotting analysis showed that MAb 8G7 recognized a very high molecular weight protein (over 500 kD, which was the expected size for native MUC4), whereas MAb 1G8 does not show any immunoreactive bands. The IHC analysis also showed MAb 8G7 positive staining but MAb 1G8 negative staining in the twoMUC4 and MUC1 Expression in Early Gastric Cancersgastric cancer cell lines. MUC4 mRNA was also expressed in the two gastric cancer cell lines in the present study, as shown in the previous study analyzing the pancreatic cancer cell lines by RTPCR and northen blot analyses [33,34]. Both MAb 8G7 and MAb 1G8 react with human gastric cancer tissues,.
