Tion (P = 0.288 for the HL statistic). In post-hoc sensitivity analyses, women with more than a high school education level were significantly more 842-07-9 web likely to be sexually active (OR = 1.26, 95 CI = 1.02?.57, P = 0.035). Inclusion of the education variable in the modeldid not substantively influence 1326631 the assocation of any of the other variables in the core model with sexual activity. When separate models were run for patients with limited and diffuse SSc, patients with limited SSc were significantlyDiscussionThis is the first study to compare rates of sexual activity and function in a sample of women living with a serious chronic disease to women from a general population sample. Although the SSc sample was from Canada and the general population sample was from the UK, the results were sufficiently robust to be confident that, controlling for age and marital status, women with SSc were significantly less likely to be sexually active and significantly more likely to be sexually impaired than women from a generalFemale Sexual Functioning in Systemic SclerosisTable 2. Comparison of sexual activity rates between women with systemic sclerosis and women from a UK general population sample, stratified by age and marital status.Married CSRG Age Group 18?9 30?9 40?9 50?9 60?9 70+ Total N 5 18 103 171 156 52 505 N ( ) Active 4 (80) 12 (67) 71 (69) 92 (54) 62 (40) 11 (21) 252 (50) UK N 8 91 143 294 263 78 877 N ( ) Active 5 (63) 81 (89) 119 (83) 220 (75) 140 (53) 34 (44) 599 (68) Rate Ratio 1.28 0.75 0.83 0.72 0.75 0.49 0.73 95 CI 0.64?.56 0.54?.05 0.71?.96 0.62?.84 0.60?.93 0.27?.87 0.66?.Non-Married CSRG N 8 13 36 52 79 37 225 N ( ) Active 2 (25) 7 (54) 14 (39) 9 (17) 10 (13) 2 (5) 44 (20) UK N 10 65 110 186 172 78 621 N ( ) Active 8 (80) 52 (80) 88 (80) 117 (63) 78 (45) 14 (18) 357 (57) Rate Ratio 0.31 0.67 0.49 0.28 0.28 0.30 0.34 95 CI 0.09?.08 0.40?.13 0.32?.74 0.15?.50 0.15?.51 0.07?.26 0.26?.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052129.tpopulation sample. This finding consistently held across groups stratified by age and marital status. When women with SSc and women from the general population with similar sexual impairment scores were compared, women with SSc had significantly worse lubrication and pain scores. purchase BTZ043 Overall sexual satisfaction was more highly associated with impairment ratings among women with SSc compared to women from the general population sample. There are many factors that may influence sexual satisfaction, some of which are related to health status and impairment and others that are not. This finding suggests that factors related to sexual impairment were more important in the scope of overall sexual satisfaction in SSc than in the general population, whereas other factors may play a larger role. Low rates of sexual activity and high rates of sexual impairment are commonly reported in women with chronic diseases [18], including SSc [11,12,19?3]. However, no previous studies had compared rates to those from a general population sample using a validated method of assessment. Thus, the extent to which rates among women with chronic diseases, including SSc, were different from the general population was not clear. We know of two large general population studies 18325633 that have used the FSFI to separately estimate rates of sexual activity and impairment [9,10]. One of these two studies comprised the sampleof women in the UK that was used in the present study [9]. In this sample, 64 of women were sexually active, and among sexually active wome.Tion (P = 0.288 for the HL statistic). In post-hoc sensitivity analyses, women with more than a high school education level were significantly more likely to be sexually active (OR = 1.26, 95 CI = 1.02?.57, P = 0.035). Inclusion of the education variable in the modeldid not substantively influence 1326631 the assocation of any of the other variables in the core model with sexual activity. When separate models were run for patients with limited and diffuse SSc, patients with limited SSc were significantlyDiscussionThis is the first study to compare rates of sexual activity and function in a sample of women living with a serious chronic disease to women from a general population sample. Although the SSc sample was from Canada and the general population sample was from the UK, the results were sufficiently robust to be confident that, controlling for age and marital status, women with SSc were significantly less likely to be sexually active and significantly more likely to be sexually impaired than women from a generalFemale Sexual Functioning in Systemic SclerosisTable 2. Comparison of sexual activity rates between women with systemic sclerosis and women from a UK general population sample, stratified by age and marital status.Married CSRG Age Group 18?9 30?9 40?9 50?9 60?9 70+ Total N 5 18 103 171 156 52 505 N ( ) Active 4 (80) 12 (67) 71 (69) 92 (54) 62 (40) 11 (21) 252 (50) UK N 8 91 143 294 263 78 877 N ( ) Active 5 (63) 81 (89) 119 (83) 220 (75) 140 (53) 34 (44) 599 (68) Rate Ratio 1.28 0.75 0.83 0.72 0.75 0.49 0.73 95 CI 0.64?.56 0.54?.05 0.71?.96 0.62?.84 0.60?.93 0.27?.87 0.66?.Non-Married CSRG N 8 13 36 52 79 37 225 N ( ) Active 2 (25) 7 (54) 14 (39) 9 (17) 10 (13) 2 (5) 44 (20) UK N 10 65 110 186 172 78 621 N ( ) Active 8 (80) 52 (80) 88 (80) 117 (63) 78 (45) 14 (18) 357 (57) Rate Ratio 0.31 0.67 0.49 0.28 0.28 0.30 0.34 95 CI 0.09?.08 0.40?.13 0.32?.74 0.15?.50 0.15?.51 0.07?.26 0.26?.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052129.tpopulation sample. This finding consistently held across groups stratified by age and marital status. When women with SSc and women from the general population with similar sexual impairment scores were compared, women with SSc had significantly worse lubrication and pain scores. Overall sexual satisfaction was more highly associated with impairment ratings among women with SSc compared to women from the general population sample. There are many factors that may influence sexual satisfaction, some of which are related to health status and impairment and others that are not. This finding suggests that factors related to sexual impairment were more important in the scope of overall sexual satisfaction in SSc than in the general population, whereas other factors may play a larger role. Low rates of sexual activity and high rates of sexual impairment are commonly reported in women with chronic diseases [18], including SSc [11,12,19?3]. However, no previous studies had compared rates to those from a general population sample using a validated method of assessment. Thus, the extent to which rates among women with chronic diseases, including SSc, were different from the general population was not clear. We know of two large general population studies 18325633 that have used the FSFI to separately estimate rates of sexual activity and impairment [9,10]. One of these two studies comprised the sampleof women in the UK that was used in the present study [9]. In this sample, 64 of women were sexually active, and among sexually active wome.
