Peptide represents putative SBP binding peptide in Pea-15 and the 15900046 latter is a peptide obtained from the literature. The common interacting residues from SBP for both the peptides are labelled and are shown as blue sticks. PD denotes serine protease domain in both the Figures. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055416.g?the peptide GSAWFSF and 1.5 A for GQYYFV from the starting unbound form. The RMSF of these trajectories were comparable with rmsd values showing higher relative fluctuations in and around the hinge region. Representative RMSF plots for GQYYFV and GSAWFSF bound HtrA2 complexes depict these large fluctuations for residues 190?25 as shown in Figures 4b and C respectively. All structural alignment comparisons and relative fluctuation analyses post MDS emphasize distinct significant conformational change in the hinge (211?26) region upon peptide binding. In addition to this, binding of peptides led to dynamic movements in many functionally important regions distal to SBP such as helices a5 and a7 in PDZ domain.Conformational Transitions in Flexible Regions and at the Active SiteFurther detailed analyses of the effect that local subtle structural changes at SBP had on distal regions of the protease especially at the active site and its vicinity revealed the possibility of SBP being a putative allosteric site. Functional active site formation and its accessibility along with a well formed BTZ043 chemical information oxyanion hole are important prerequisites for the activity of an enzyme. Structural comparison of the MD simulated peptide bound structure of HtrA2 with the unbound form show movements in MedChemExpress 256373-96-3 different domains and linker regions. The PDZ-protease linker that covers the peptide binding groove in the PDZ domain moves away from it thus increasing it accessibility. The peptide bound HtrA2 complex show relative movements in the active site triad residues compared to the unbound form. Atomic distance analysis of both the forms revealed that distances between nitrogen (e) atom of H65 and oxygen (c) atom of S173 increased in peptide bound complexes while that between nitrogen (d) atom of H65 and oxygen (d) of D95 decreased when compared with the unbound HtrA2 structure (Table 3). This pattern being consistent with boththe peptides suggests that interaction of peptide activator with SBP leads to opening up of the active site cleft. Apart from active site triad, changes were also observed in the orientation of mechanistically important L1, LD and LA loops in the peptide bound complex (Figures 4d ). Their orientations with respect to the active site determine proper oxyanion hole formation, accessibility of the active site, formation of catalytic triad and hence enzyme activity. MDS analyses for these regions showed significant deviations upon peptide binding. Structural alignment of GSAWFSF bound HtrA2 complex with the unbound form demonstrated breaking of Van der Waals contacts between loop LD and b2 strand of protease domain which facilitates LD movement towards a1 of protease domain and bringing P130 of the former in proximity to A25 of the latter. Similarly, S50 in b2 of protease domain establishes interactions with G171 of L1 (oxyanion hole residue) while breaking contacts with A132 of LD loop due to movement or tilt in the L1 loop. As a result of this reorganization, LD which was closer to L1 in the unbound HtrA2 moves sharply away from it upon peptide binding. These positional rearrangements also lead to disruption of interaction between D165 of L1 and G195 o.Peptide represents putative SBP binding peptide in Pea-15 and the 15900046 latter is a peptide obtained from the literature. The common interacting residues from SBP for both the peptides are labelled and are shown as blue sticks. PD denotes serine protease domain in both the Figures. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055416.g?the peptide GSAWFSF and 1.5 A for GQYYFV from the starting unbound form. The RMSF of these trajectories were comparable with rmsd values showing higher relative fluctuations in and around the hinge region. Representative RMSF plots for GQYYFV and GSAWFSF bound HtrA2 complexes depict these large fluctuations for residues 190?25 as shown in Figures 4b and C respectively. All structural alignment comparisons and relative fluctuation analyses post MDS emphasize distinct significant conformational change in the hinge (211?26) region upon peptide binding. In addition to this, binding of peptides led to dynamic movements in many functionally important regions distal to SBP such as helices a5 and a7 in PDZ domain.Conformational Transitions in Flexible Regions and at the Active SiteFurther detailed analyses of the effect that local subtle structural changes at SBP had on distal regions of the protease especially at the active site and its vicinity revealed the possibility of SBP being a putative allosteric site. Functional active site formation and its accessibility along with a well formed oxyanion hole are important prerequisites for the activity of an enzyme. Structural comparison of the MD simulated peptide bound structure of HtrA2 with the unbound form show movements in different domains and linker regions. The PDZ-protease linker that covers the peptide binding groove in the PDZ domain moves away from it thus increasing it accessibility. The peptide bound HtrA2 complex show relative movements in the active site triad residues compared to the unbound form. Atomic distance analysis of both the forms revealed that distances between nitrogen (e) atom of H65 and oxygen (c) atom of S173 increased in peptide bound complexes while that between nitrogen (d) atom of H65 and oxygen (d) of D95 decreased when compared with the unbound HtrA2 structure (Table 3). This pattern being consistent with boththe peptides suggests that interaction of peptide activator with SBP leads to opening up of the active site cleft. Apart from active site triad, changes were also observed in the orientation of mechanistically important L1, LD and LA loops in the peptide bound complex (Figures 4d ). Their orientations with respect to the active site determine proper oxyanion hole formation, accessibility of the active site, formation of catalytic triad and hence enzyme activity. MDS analyses for these regions showed significant deviations upon peptide binding. Structural alignment of GSAWFSF bound HtrA2 complex with the unbound form demonstrated breaking of Van der Waals contacts between loop LD and b2 strand of protease domain which facilitates LD movement towards a1 of protease domain and bringing P130 of the former in proximity to A25 of the latter. Similarly, S50 in b2 of protease domain establishes interactions with G171 of L1 (oxyanion hole residue) while breaking contacts with A132 of LD loop due to movement or tilt in the L1 loop. As a result of this reorganization, LD which was closer to L1 in the unbound HtrA2 moves sharply away from it upon peptide binding. These positional rearrangements also lead to disruption of interaction between D165 of L1 and G195 o.
