Ater found to be widely distributed in the PalearcticJose L. Fernandez-Triana et al. / ZooKeys 383: 1?65 (2014)region (Yu et al. 2005) and not related at all to the Mexican species. Acting as the first reviser, Shenefelt realized the problem of a secondary homonym, but mistakenly assigned a replacement name for the oldest (Cameron 1904) instead of the youngest (Tobias 1964) name. As a result, Apanteles albinervican Shenefelt, 1972 became a replacement name for Urogaster albinervis Cameron, 1904, while A. albinervis Tobias, 1964 remained unchanged (Shenefelt 1972). Article 24.2.5 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999) regulates “Unnecessary action by a First Reviser” and states that “if it is shown subsequently that the precedence of names, spellings or acts can be objectively determined, the action of the First Reviser is nullified”. Thus we consider here Apanteles albinervican Shenefelt, 1972 an invalid replacement name for Apanteles albinervis (Cameron, 1904) and reinstate the latter name. For details of the revised get Mequitazine status of the Tobias species see section “Species excluded from Apanteles”. Another unrelated use of the name “Apanteles albinervis”, was by Ashmead (1905), who described a species from the Philippines as “Urogaster albinervis”. That became a primary homonym of U. albinervis Cameron; however, a replacement name for the Philipine species, Apanteles lucidinervis, was provided by Wilkinson (1928). Apanteles alejandromasisi Fern dez-Triana, sp. n. http://zoobank.org/C301B64A-5C8A-48FB-9181-C95438CE4EF9 http://species-id.net/wiki/Apanteles_alejandromasisi Fig. 37 Type locality. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector El Hacha, Sendero Bejuquilla, 280 m, 11.03004, -85.52699. GLPG0187MedChemExpress GLPG0187 Holotype. in CNC. Specimen labels: 1. DHJPAR0012499. 2. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector El Hacha, Sendero Bejuquilla, 280 meters, 11.03004 Longitude: -85.52699, D.H. Janzen W. Hallwachs. Description. Female. Body color: head pale, mesosoma extensively pale (anteromesoscutum and scutellar disc). Antenna color: scape and/or pedicel pale, flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): pale, pale, partially pale/partially dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): pale, pale, mostly pale but posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tibiae color (pro-, meso-, metatibia): pale, pale, mostly pale but with posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tegula and humeral complex color: both pale. Pterostigma color: dark. Fore wing veins color: mostly dark (a few veins may be unpigmented). Body in lateral view: not distinctly flattened dorso entrally. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 3.1?.2 mm. Fore wing length: 3.3?.4 mm. Ocular cellar line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.3?.5. Interocellar distance/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.3?.5. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.6?.8. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.7?1.9. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.3?.5. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike seta. Metafemur length/width: 2.8?.9. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with deep, dense punctures (separated by less than 2.0 ?its maximum diam-Review of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…eter). Mesoscutellar disc: mostly punctured. Number of pits in scutoscutellar sulcus: 5 or 6. Maximum height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.4?.5. Propodeum areola: partially defined by carinae on posterior 0.3?.5 of its length, widely open anteriorly. Propodeum background sc.Ater found to be widely distributed in the PalearcticJose L. Fernandez-Triana et al. / ZooKeys 383: 1?65 (2014)region (Yu et al. 2005) and not related at all to the Mexican species. Acting as the first reviser, Shenefelt realized the problem of a secondary homonym, but mistakenly assigned a replacement name for the oldest (Cameron 1904) instead of the youngest (Tobias 1964) name. As a result, Apanteles albinervican Shenefelt, 1972 became a replacement name for Urogaster albinervis Cameron, 1904, while A. albinervis Tobias, 1964 remained unchanged (Shenefelt 1972). Article 24.2.5 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999) regulates “Unnecessary action by a First Reviser” and states that “if it is shown subsequently that the precedence of names, spellings or acts can be objectively determined, the action of the First Reviser is nullified”. Thus we consider here Apanteles albinervican Shenefelt, 1972 an invalid replacement name for Apanteles albinervis (Cameron, 1904) and reinstate the latter name. For details of the revised status of the Tobias species see section “Species excluded from Apanteles”. Another unrelated use of the name “Apanteles albinervis”, was by Ashmead (1905), who described a species from the Philippines as “Urogaster albinervis”. That became a primary homonym of U. albinervis Cameron; however, a replacement name for the Philipine species, Apanteles lucidinervis, was provided by Wilkinson (1928). Apanteles alejandromasisi Fern dez-Triana, sp. n. http://zoobank.org/C301B64A-5C8A-48FB-9181-C95438CE4EF9 http://species-id.net/wiki/Apanteles_alejandromasisi Fig. 37 Type locality. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector El Hacha, Sendero Bejuquilla, 280 m, 11.03004, -85.52699. Holotype. in CNC. Specimen labels: 1. DHJPAR0012499. 2. COSTA RICA, Guanacaste, ACG, Sector El Hacha, Sendero Bejuquilla, 280 meters, 11.03004 Longitude: -85.52699, D.H. Janzen W. Hallwachs. Description. Female. Body color: head pale, mesosoma extensively pale (anteromesoscutum and scutellar disc). Antenna color: scape and/or pedicel pale, flagellum dark. Coxae color (pro-, meso-, metacoxa): pale, pale, partially pale/partially dark. Femora color (pro-, meso-, metafemur): pale, pale, mostly pale but posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tibiae color (pro-, meso-, metatibia): pale, pale, mostly pale but with posterior 0.2 or less dark. Tegula and humeral complex color: both pale. Pterostigma color: dark. Fore wing veins color: mostly dark (a few veins may be unpigmented). Body in lateral view: not distinctly flattened dorso entrally. Body length (head to apex of metasoma): 3.1?.2 mm. Fore wing length: 3.3?.4 mm. Ocular cellar line/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.3?.5. Interocellar distance/posterior ocellus diameter: 2.3?.5. Antennal flagellomerus 2 length/width: 2.6?.8. Antennal flagellomerus 14 length/width: 1.7?1.9. Length of flagellomerus 2/length of flagellomerus 14: 2.3?.5. Tarsal claws: with single basal spine ike seta. Metafemur length/width: 2.8?.9. Anteromesoscutum: mostly with deep, dense punctures (separated by less than 2.0 ?its maximum diam-Review of Apanteles sensu stricto (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Microgastrinae)…eter). Mesoscutellar disc: mostly punctured. Number of pits in scutoscutellar sulcus: 5 or 6. Maximum height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum: 0.4?.5. Propodeum areola: partially defined by carinae on posterior 0.3?.5 of its length, widely open anteriorly. Propodeum background sc.
