WS80 watershed weir outlet gauging stations (Figure 1a,b). These digital
WS80 watershed weir outlet gauging stations (Figure 1a,b). These digital stage data had been utilized with established rating curves for compound V-notch weirs for estimating streamflow rates [39,44,45]. Information of stream gauges, stage measurements, and estimates of flow prices along with the top quality control are given in [44,45]. The flow data have been recently verified and are of a good quality for the rating range they had been developed for. Each day average weather parameters obtained from weather sensors installed on a 27-m tall tower (above the forest canopy) in WS80 in 2010 (Figure 1a,b) were utilised to estimate daily Penman onteith (P-M) [46] primarily based possible evapotranspiration (PET) for the forest circumstances following Amatya et al. [47] (Table 3). A three m weather station installed on open grass at the nearby SEF AZD4625 Ras Headquarters (SHQ) (Figure 1a) [48] supplied information to fill in some missing values for a few short periods [45].Water 2021, 13,7 ofTable three. Measured annual rainfall, flow, ET (rainfall low), and ROC (runoff coefficient = flow/rainfall) and estimated PET for the WS77 and WS80 watersheds for 2011019. Year WS80 Rainfall, mm 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Average Std Dev COV 934 1174 1433 1375 2171 1743 1443 1633 1381 1476 351.1 0.24 WS80 Flow, mm 31 28 220 199 968 562 217 361 201 309 295.0 0.95 WS80 ROC 0.03 0.02 0.15 0.15 0.45 0.32 0.15 0.22 0.15 0.19 0.13 0.71 WS80 ET mm 903 1146 1214 1176 1204 1181 1226 1272 1180 1167 105.four 0.09 WS77 Rainfall, mm 977 1148 1502 1340 2146 1709 1555 1661 1429 1496 338.7 0.23 WS77 Flow, mm 58 55 334 293 950 633 392 474 334 391 277.eight 0.71 WS77 ROC 0.06 0.05 0.22 0.22 0.44 0.37 0.25 0.29 0.23 0.24 0.13 0.54 WS77 ET, mm 919 1092 1168 1047 1196 1076 1163 1187 1095 1105 87.2 0.08 Forest P-M PET, mm 1351 1239 1017 1123 1098 1197 1177 1146 1200 1172 93.9 0.The WT in upland properly H and riparian nicely D in WS80 and upland properly J in WS77 have been measured hourly considering that 2004 utilizing pressure transducers with a datalogger (Figure 1a,b). Effectively K near the riparian location in WS77 was installed in 2018 (Figure 1b). All wells were about two.eight to 3 m deep. Plots of the every day water table depths of properly J and properly H for 2011019 are presented in Figure S2. Measurements of the leaf area index (LAI) were carried out just about every 2 or three weeks in 2019020 (n = 9) at three areas SC-19220 Prostaglandin Receptor proposed for LLP remedy in WS77 (Figure 1b). The average LAI measured in the course of 2008009 (n = 40) and reported by Dai et al. [43] for WS80 had been utilised, assuming the LAI on the totally recovered stands on this control watershed remained unchanged. A comparison of WS77 LAI with WS80 LAI is shown in Figure S3. Particulars of all hydro-meteorologic measurements, like data high quality manage, might be identified elsewhere [15,17,43,44,49]. 3.three. Data and Statistical Analyses Measured daily rainfall, streamflow or runoff (watershed area-based depth), and PET, estimated in the everyday weather information for the 2011019 period, had been utilised to receive month-to-month and annual totals and to compute the annual rainfall normalized runoff coefficient (ROC). The number of day-to-day rain events 25 mm in every year was also logged. Flow data had been lost for both watersheds for Hurricane Joaquin (3 October 2015), even though only WS77 lost some data for Hurricane Matthew (eight October 2016), because the measured stage exceeded the rating curve selection of every single watershed. The exceptionally high flow of October four, 2015 was assumed to be an outlier, as discussed inside the Benefits section below, to ensure that month was excluded from both wat.
