Tly connected to land-sparing or land-sharing approaches, a debate which is
Tly associated to land-sparing or land-sharing approaches, a debate that is far from becoming closed [14]. The multifunctionality paradigm competes currently with new tips, including rewilding [15], which, in turn, can accentuate lingering conflicts if not properly handled [16]. If conflicts are ubiquitous, as we state above, inferring general tendencies might be an important advancement towards a forest SES theory development. The question that follows then is if forest SESs would have unique types of conflicts not identified in other ecosystems. A further particularity of forests is the fact that, even if they occur on private lands, they may be under the manage or strict supervision of governments in most nations with the globe. The same applies to forests occurring in first nation or indigenous reserves, in which, regardless of the autonomy granted, the management should be in accord with national regulations. Here, our principal premise could be that forest SESs would be prone to conflict because of lagged responses between the time that choices are made by regional actors and adjustments in the ecological and Sutezolid References social systems, which usually do not necessarily adhere to the exact same cycles of decision producing of local institutions, regional forest authorities, and national governments. These lags in decision making are additional confounded by distinct views ofCitation: Fern dez-Manjarr , J.F.; MacHunter, J.; Zavala, M.A. Forest Management, Conflict and Social cological Systems within a Changing Planet. Forests 2021, 12, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/ f12111459 Received: 28 September 2021 Accepted: 22 October 2021 Published: 26 OctoberPublisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.Copyright: 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This short article is definitely an open access report distributed under the terms and circumstances with the Inventive Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ four.0/).Forests 2021, 12, 1459. https://doi.org/10.3390/fhttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/forestsForests 2021, 12,Forests 2021, 12,2 of2 ofthe individual actors and regional administrations that fully grasp governance differently.the person actors and we present initial a basic typology of PF-06454589 MedChemExpress sources of conflicts Within this editorial short article, regional administrations that fully grasp governance differently. prior to introducing the contributions by the authors on diverse subjects, and of conflicts just before Within this editorial article, we present initial a common typology of sources we conclude by raising awareness of your effects that current “transition” approaches may have conclude by introducing the contributions by the authors on distinct subjects, and we for forest management regarded aseffects that present “transition” approaches might have for forest raising awareness from the SESs.management considered as SESs. two. A Simplified Typology 2. A Simplified Typology To assist withassist with exploration ofof the tensions, wetensions, a very simple two-dimen- twoTo exploration in the origin the origin on the propose we propose a uncomplicated sion typology that integrates integrates a variety of the conflicts observed in forest SESs (Figure 1). dimension typology that several the conflicts observed in forest SESs (Figure 1).Figure 1. A simplified typology of several of the possible sources of conflicts in forests. The vertical axis represents the newly created pressures of international of conflicts in forests. The vertical Figure 1. A simp.
